… give or take
// In this sixth and final part of the series on god, consider an extension of the problem seen in Part 5. If god is defined as a being not of this reality, then nothing in this reality can be brought as evidence in favor of it. The God believer has defined himself into a [...]
// In Part 4 of this series, we saw that believing in natural reality is logically prior to and more fundamental than believing in the supernatural, contrary to what many religious thinkers argue. Further problems for the God believer arise when we take a closer look at the belief in the supernatural unto itself. One [...]
Naturalism vs. Supernaturalism // Since God is not of natural reality, belief in God requires belief in a supernatural reality. Generally speaking, secularist and atheist people believe that only natural reality exists, while religious people believe that both natural reality and supernatural reality exist. So which should we believe? The basic problem with either belief [...]
// I am provocatively titling this little part of the series as “How to Disprove God in 5 Easy Steps.” Not literally, perhaps, but at least it would seem to further problematize the concept of “God.” Here goes nothing. Everything that is real is a part of reality Nothing can be a part of the [...]
// In the first part of this series, I posed the following question: can God create another God? The answer to this is either yes or no. I dealt with the “yes” answer yesterday, now we consider the “no” answer. Remember that “God” is believed to be uncreated, and so if God can create another [...]
