Archive for the 'Political' Category
September 28th, 2011 by Justin
Continuing from part 3, on why the rich are taxed less than everyone else.
6. Corporations and businesses
The largest business firms in America are in a position to exploit countless loopholes and exemptions and deductions, as well as lobby for and legislate new ones, that small and medium-sized businesses will never be able to enjoy. The proof is in the pudding; again, see the GE story. In addition, note that at the highest levels of corporate income, not only do the merely rich and the mega rich pay the same (see number 1), but there is actually a regressive phenomenon. Specifically, according to SMBiz.com, instead of going up, as a corporation increases in income, the tax rate goes up, then down, then up, and then down! Here are the corporate tax rates:
Taxable income over Not over Tax rate
$ 0 $ 50,000 15%
50,000 75,000 25%
75,000 100,000 34%
100,000 335,000 39%
335,000 10,000,000 34%
10,000,000 15,000,000 35%
15,000,000 18,333,333 38%
18,333,333 .......... 35%
We can see that a corporation that makes $5 million in taxable income actually pays a lower tax rate (34%) than a corporation making only $200,000 (39%)! And moreover, the corporations at the highest income levels–$20 million, $100 million, $10 billion or more–are subject to a rate of only 35%, while those orders of magnitude lower (such as $17 million) must pay a higher 38 percent. Extraordinary but true. The same rules apply as far as influence peddling and lobbying: the biggest corporations can do it, and they do it in spades, while small and medium-sized businesses (where most of the jobs and economic production comes from) simply do not have the resources or the money to do that. The biggest firms are able to take advantage of loopholes and exemptions so much that the actual tax rates themselves have become all but meaningless for them (but still relevant to everyone else). Obviously business owners that own the biggest companies get off far easier than those who own average businesses.
September 27th, 2011 by Justin
Continuing from Part 2, reasons why the rich are taxed less than everyone else in America.
5. The rich spend less and save more
It is a very common observation in economics that people with greater incomes tend to save more of their money. This is true not just in absolute terms, but in proportional terms as well: the rich save a higher proportion of their money than the poor; and in the same way, the poor spend a higher proportion of their money than the rich. “Saving” in economics includes actions referred to as “investment” in common parlance, as well as normal saving. This means that the rich enjoy an overall lower tax burden than the poor or middle class. A greater proportion of their money goes into saving and investment vehicles that are taxed much less, or not at all. Capital gains taxes are a prime example of this.
September 26th, 2011 by Justin
Continuing from Part 1, reasons why the rich are taxed less than everyone else in America.
3. The rich enjoy outsize influence over the government
The wealthiest Americans enjoy significant influence over the political and legislative process. They are able to nudge policy in this or that direction through their campaign donations, influence peddling and lobbying. The senators, representatives, department heads and other major national political leaders are themselves very rich, and are thus cut from the same social and economic cloth. It stands to reason that they would take liberties here or there to write tax laws favorable to themselves. This helps to explain why the American tax code is so damn complicated, confusing and impenetrable.
4. Capital gains taxes and similar taxes
The rich derive a greater proportion of their income and wealth from capital gains than the middle and lower classes. Capital gains are taxed at a much lower rate of 15% than “normal” income. Thus even if a person makes $2 million in a single year from a capital gain, he will only need to pay the tax rate of someone making $10,000 income on that money. Money is money, and no matter where it comes from, it should be taxed the same. The reason the capital gains tax (and several other taxes that similarly apply only to the wealthy or very wealthy) is so low relative to the income tax is (see number 3 above) because of influence peddling as well as the legitimate desire of the politicians to incentivize certain behaviors. Unfortunately, the only behaviors they ever seem to incentivize are those pursued by the wealthy.
September 25th, 2011 by Justin
On the surface, it may seem that the rich in America pay more in taxes than the middle class or poor. And technically, this is true. The tax code applies higher marginal income tax rates the further up on the income scale one gets. But this is only half the story.
There are several key factors that those who argue that the rich are taxed enough, or too much, fail to realize. Stephen Ohlemacher’s so-called “fact check” misses all of the facts listed below.
1. The merely rich and the mega rich are taxed at the same rate.
Perhaps the most obvious and interesting problem with the tax code is that the same income tax rate applies to those in the upper middle class and those at the highest incomes. This is plainly obvious to a casual observer, but is almost always missed by the experts and the pundits pontificating on these issues. Money Chimp provides basic tax rate information. The marginal rates for 2011 are 10, 15, 25, 28, 33 and 35% for increasing income levels. The 35% rate begins at those earning $379,150.
Since 35% is the highest tax rate on the books, this means that a person earning $400,000 pays the same tax rate as a person earning $4 million! And the same as a person earning $40 million, or $400 million! So we see that even with income increasing by orders of magnitude, the marginal income tax rate stays the same.
As one moves up the income scale, from $10,000 to $30,000 for instance, or from $30,000 to $90,000, one will feel an increasing tax burden. But then, after a certain point, there is no increase. As one becomes richer, one’s tax rate does not go up. This is a key element of inequality and unfairness in the tax code. And very few people are aware of it.
2. The rich benefit from high-priced accountants and attorneys who can minimize their tax burden
Although technically many people can take advantage of various exemptions and deductions in the tax code, it is the upper classes that are best prepared to exploit them. They are able to pay the best accountants and tax lawyers to investigate the tax code and squeeze every last drop of value out of their tax return. Middle and lower class people don’t have a chance to compete at the same level. This helps to explain why GE, a multibillion dollar corporation, was able to get away with paying little or no taxes at all for years.
June 27th, 2011 by Justin
Map of same-sex marriage laws in the US, 2011. Source: Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Samesex_marriage_in_USA.svg
New York state’s recognition of gay marriage is a significant point in the evolution of American marriage rights. New York has become the largest, most influential and most important state to recognize gay marriage. Although New York is unequivocally a liberal state, it does contain a significant conservative element, especially in the northern part of the state, and is also one of the most diverse states ethnically, culturally and economically. The fact that several Republican legislators voted in favor of gay marriage is notable as well. New York’s recognition of gay marriage thus adds major legal and political momentum to the overall trend of American acceptance of homosexual unions.
Indeed, a recent Gallup study demonstrated that for the first time the majority of Americans are in favor of gay marriage. The study indicates that the rise in support among Democrats and Independents pushed the number over fifty percent. Republicans did not significantly change their views. The Gallup study also indicates that gay marriage constitutes a major cleavage among Americans politically, with liberals overwhelmingly in favor, and conservatives largely opposed. Specifically, a whopping 78% of liberals in 2011 were in favor of legal gay marriage, while only 28% of conservatives were. Even so, both numbers increased from the previous year.
In addition, gay marriage forms a distinct division between older and younger Americans. An amazing 70% of those between 18 and 34 support gay marriage, while just 39% of those 55 and over do.
Clearly, the cultural and political wind is at the back of same-sex marriage. It is looking more likely that gay marriage is all but inevitable in the United States eventually. This is despite the fact that the majority of states have imposed restrictions on same-sex marriage. In Mississippi, for instance (one of the most conservative states, but not as representative or consequential as New York), 86% of voters approved a ban on gay marriage in 2004.
Nevertheless, American history has proven time after time that the majority’s desires are to be taken seriously, but must also be tempered by the rights of the minority. As a general rule, those who advocate more freedom for more people, rather than less, tend to win the day in America. In any case, as the Gallup study shows, the popular opinion has been and continues to move in favor of the rights on this issue. Ultimately, other alternative relationships among consenting adults will have to be recognized and respected by the state, such as polygamous unions. And the only way to truly resolve the current incongruences in legal rights relating to inheritance, insurance, taxes and a plethora of other issues is to abolish the concept of civil “marriage” altogether and replace it with contracts that the state can recognize. The softer aspects of marriage should be left to the private domain of religion and private relationships, where they should have been all along.
